Meeting 16.12.2024

Vote for next dates

Attendees

  • Markus
  • Jannis
  • Stefanie (approved MR)
  • Filip
  • Johannes
  • Andrei

Not here:

  • Christoph (approved MR)

Buddies

  • Stefanie & Christoph
  • Jannis & Andrei
  • Filip & Johannes (Infrastructure)
  • Lukas & Jannis (Project)

Agenda

  • 09:00 start
  • protocol: Jannis
  • buddy task:
    • review of related work
  • which of the next dates are wanted?
  • review-friendly MRs
  • Johannes: question about scraper
  • Filip disconnect
  • progress measured by agreed tasks done
    • NOT by pages of thesis, number of experiments done etc.
    • always use best way of documentation: code comments, assert, test cases, tutorial, guidelines, thesis, ...
  • Paper to cite https://www.dhbw-stuttgart.de/forschung-transfer/technik/schriftenreihe-insights/
  • e2e next steps (updated)
    1. make more stable and user friendly (tickets are assigned)
    2. more tests
    3. optimize
  • Johannes disconnect
  • updates in this MR
    • Inserting Relations
  • Task Board
  • 10:30 finish

Tasks

To be done until Thursday 19.12.2024 23:59:

  • vote for next dates
  • buddy task: review related work
  • approve requested MRs, including meeting MR
  • complete your issues or state in the issue any block/alternative
  • create/update issues for yourself and assign to next iteration

Do as needed:

  • request reviews
  • submit a page of text in submissions
  • get MRs done

Meeting Notes

Survey: One or two meeting for the next three weeks, vote for date.

For reviews: always copy out the checklist.

Documentation is everything that helps the reviewer understand what's happening without changing the functionality. This also included code comments, documents (even thesis), assertions, test cases, names,identifier names, formatting and many more. Progress of the thesis is measured on number of agreed tasks.

Paper on PermaplanT has been published and can be cited in the thesis.

For collecting papers - we can also only submit Latex bib file for reviews. Google scholar bib files are often wrong and need some fixing.